|
Businesses in north west England are
still experiencing communications problems, four days after a fire
in a tunnel destroyed critical British Telecom cables. In this short
article IBM’s Robin Gaddum gives his thoughts on what businesses
should learn from the incident:
1.
Disruption to office workers through loss of voice connectivity
is an obvious consequence of the incident. Data traffic has also
been affected. For example if a business had its data centre in
the affected area then, whilst its systems might be functioning
normally, those accessing and updating systems remotely might be
unable to do so or experience degraded response times.
2. Larger businesses with distributed offices
and a voice telephony network with multiple points of entry / exit
to the public switched network have been better able to cope by
diverting incoming calls at the affected office to other locations
in the short term and either transferring workloads or asking staff
to work from another office for a period. They are also generally
financially in a stronger position to absorb the cost of a few days
lost productivity in a part of the organisation. The impact upon
single office location SMEs in the affected area could be more serious
- particularly as this type of business often underspends or has
no business continuity arrangements.
3. Some organisations may have hesitated to
invoke business continuity measures, believing that the disruption
would be short term, i.e. they will take the hit of several days
interruption to communications; time will tell if they have gambled
correctly (those without business continuity arrangements have little
choice). I would generally recommend invoking immediately and preparing
the recovery site for use before taking the decision whether or
not to restart live operations from the recovery site, otherwise
valuable time is lost.
4. This incident reinforces the need to select
a recovery site location with some care to avoid live and disaster
recovery site being affected by the same event. Too often we focus
upon distance and ignore other potential risk profiles that do not
vary in a linear fashion with distance. Relying upon the same exchange
is one example, same flood plain is another example. In my experience,
most specialist third party provider disaster recovery sites are
resilient to this type of event through diverse telecomms supplies
and / or the facility to fall clients back to an alternate disaster
recovery site.
5. Cellular networks will always experience
increased traffic volumes when land lines are unavailable, possibly
rendering this fallback method of communications unreliable.
6. Companies such as Cellhire offer a form
of disaster recovery agreement for the supply and short term rental
of mobile phones, satellite phones and satellite data terminals.
These are used, amongst others, by some of the blue light services.
Combination phones that switch between available cellular networks
and fall back to satellite are also available. There are some drawbacks
to satellite phones in that they are not always intuitive to just
pick up and use and it can be difficult to find a satellite footprint
if in a metropolitan area which is surrounded by tall buildings.
7. In the immediate aftermath of the World
Trade Center event when the New York landline and cellular networks
were seriously affected, IBM established a secure emergency communications
network at Ground Zero using Blackberries, which also support e-mail
communications. A number of other companies in the UK are also investigating
emergency communications services based around Blackberries.
8. Whilst this is a major incident, there are
procedures for the emergency services, BT and other carriers to
respond to and handle this sort of event. The Civil Contingencies
Bill adds to existing fixed PTO License conditions and Oftel advice
in this area in improving the UK's response to such community-wide
disruption.
9. It is worth noting that risk is rarely,
if ever, eliminated. This sort of event could have affected any
carrier but is statistically more likely to affect a carrier with
a larger network. The carriers, in common with other utility providers
that face a similar problem, have their own problem / crisis management
groups to tackle these events when they do occur. Smaller scale
events are far more common; one cable provider indicated that on
average somewhere in the UK a section of its fibre is accidentally
cut once per week, for example by builders or roadworkers. Of course,
for businesses affected in these cases the impact is no less serious.
10. As staff increasingly commute longer distances
to their place of work, their homes may well be outside of the affected
area. Under these circumstances, homeworking may be a viable means
of mitigating some of the impact, provided staff are suitably equipped.
11. It is hard for organisations to implement
truly diverse comms at their sites. Using two separate carriers
often offers a false sense of security as almost invariably the
routes converge at some point whether it's through the same piece
of ducting or at the same exchange or in some other manner. Fallback
communications using microwave or satellite links are possible,
but expensive. At the end of the day an up-to-date and tested business
continuity plan backed up by a sensibly located recovery site with
its own PABX and supply via a separate main exchange is the best
defence.
Robin Gaddum, MBCI, is senior consultant
and team leader for IBM UK Business Continuity & Recovery Services
GADDUMR@uk.ibm.com
www-5.ibm.com/services/uk/portfolio/bcrs.html

•Date:1st
April 2004 •Region: UK •Type:
Article •Topic: Telecoms
continuity
Rate this article or
make a comment - click
here
|