The latest enterprise risk management news from around the world

The outsourcing of critical services to third parties requires a robust vendor risk management program and stringent oversight, yet the results of a new study suggest that many companies may be underperforming in these areas. Organizations must make improvements to their risk management programs in order to keep pace with the latest risks and challenges, according to the 2015 Vendor Risk Management Benchmark Study, released by the Shared Assessments Program and Protiviti.

In its second year, the Vendor Risk Management Benchmark Study examined information from more than 450 C-suite executives, risk management and audit professionals, who rated their organizations using the Vendor Risk Management Maturity Model (VRMMM), a benchmarking tool from the Shared Assessments Program that measures the quality and maturity of existing vendor risk management programs.

Survey respondents were presented with eight categories of vendor risk management. For each component within the eight categories, respondents were asked to rate its maturity level as it applies to their organization on a maturity scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). A summary of the results is as follows:

Category

2015 Index

2014 Index

YOY
Change

Program Governance

2.8

2.9

-0.1

Policies, Standards, Procedures

2.9

2.9

0.0

Contracts

2.9

3.0

-0.1

Vendor Risk Identification and Analysis

2.7

2.7

0.0

Skills and Expertise

2.3

2.3

0.0

Communication and Information Sharing

2.5

2.6

-0.1

Tools, Measurement and Analysis

2.4

2.4

0.0

Monitoring and Review

2.8

2.9

-0.1


However, these flat results do not necessarily mean that no progress has been made with regard to third-party vendor risk management. During the one-year period in between the 2014 and 2015 surveys, there was an epidemic of cybersecurity breaches, the February 2014 release of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and more oversight of IT security risk programs in general by both boards of directors and regulators. This increased regulatory focus on third-party risks means that organizations are now more aware of their own program's strengths and weaknesses, particularly at the C-suite and board level. With greater clarity about what is required to minimize and mitigate cybersecurity risks, many respondents may have rated their capabilities lower even in the face of process improvements in their firms, and may also be setting a higher bar for what they deem to be mature levels of vendor risk management.

"The increasing frequency and magnitude of cybersecurity breaches, along with recent and forthcoming regulatory actions, make it imperative that vendor risk management programs make a significant leap forward. This change requires fundamental alterations to strategies, processes and organizational culture," said Rocco Grillo, a managing director with Protiviti and the firm's global leader for incident response and forensic investigations. "The good news is that there is greater demand for building more robust vendor risk management programs. This issue is more frequently a part of the agenda for boards of directors, who are regularly seeking assurance from management that the appropriate steps are being taken to combat vendor risk."

Other key findings from the survey:

  • Vendor risk management programs require more substantive advances. The overall maturity rating for program governance in this year's survey (2.7 on a 5-point scale – below the ‘fully defined and established’ maturity level) should serve as a wake-up call that deeper changes are needed that reach into organizational culture and individual behavior, especially for financial institutions that are striving to satisfy the US ‘Getting to Strong’ regulatory mantra.
  • Vendor risk management programs within financial services organizations are relatively more mature compared to companies in insurance, healthcare and other industries. The 2015 survey results indicate that financial services firms continue to rank ahead of other industries with regard to their vendor risk management programs most notably in program governance, vendor risk identification and analysis, and communication and information sharing. Financial services organizations score on average more than a point higher in these categories. Perhaps most notable is the finding that the insurance and healthcare industries continue to lag behind financial institutions in fortifying their vendor risk management capabilities, considering the sensitivity of their data.
  • Policies, standards and procedures and contract management and criteria represent the most advanced components of current vendor risk management programs. These areas are ranked highest in terms of overall maturity among the eight program areas assessed in the survey. These two program characteristics are fundamental building blocks that can lay the groundwork for a more mature vendor risk management capability.

To access a complimentary copy of the 2015 Vendor Risk Management Benchmark Study click here.


Want news and features emailed to you?

Signup to our free newsletters and never miss a story.

A website you can trust

The entire Continuity Central website is scanned daily by Sucuri to ensure that no malware exists within the site. This means that you can browse with complete confidence.

Business continuity?

Business continuity can be defined as 'the processes, procedures, decisions and activities to ensure that an organization can continue to function through an operational interruption'. Read more about the basics of business continuity here.

Get the latest news and information sent to you by email

Continuity Central provides a number of free newsletters which are distributed by email. To subscribe click here.