Slow migration from Windows Server 2003 is driven by caution not complacency, suggests Databarracks
- Published: Friday, 05 June 2015 09:50
Organizations require practical advice, not scaremongering tactics, to prepare for end of support for Windows Server 2003, says Oscar Arean, technical operations manager at disaster recovery service provider Databarracks.
As the 14th July deadline looms for the end of support for both Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Small Business Server 2003, organizations are under pressure to assess existing IT infrastructures. According to the latest figures from the Cloud Industry Forum (CIF), however, almost 60 percent of UK organizations are still yet to migrate from Windows Server 2003.
Arean suggests that caution, rather than complacency, might actually be the barrier holding back change, and to address this certain actions can be taken:
“As Windows Server 2003 reaches end of life, organizations are under pressure to make changes to their IT infrastructure in order to stay protected,” states Arean. “It’s clear from the research by CIF that a lot of organizations still need to act but are perhaps lacking guidance on the best way to do this.
“From the outset it’s important to communicate the risks of staying with Windows Server 2003. This includes the possibility of security breaches and potential data losses, as security patches will no longer be released to protect against vulnerabilities.
“Certain applications will no longer be supported by vendors, and these could also include your backup or replication software. While they may work fine for a while, if you do have an issue, the vendor won’t be able to help and your data may be unrecoverable. While there are security products available to allow you to keep Windows Server 2003, that option will prove expensive. Additionally, expect IT support companies to increase the cost of support of 2003 boxes.”
Arean continued: “The reality is for those yet to make the move, you must act now. As a starting point, you need to determine whether you have any existing servers running Windows Server 2003, what role they play in the business, and what applications are running on them. Tools such as the Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit are a great place to start with this process.
“Then you have a few options, the first being simply to decommission your 2003 servers and migrate everything over to a brand new server running Windows 2012. Alternatively, you could move your applications onto other existing servers, but this isn’t a neat solution and if you do have difficulties, you might affect the applications already running on that server.
“You’re in a better situation if you’re already virtualized, and better yet if you have cloud services. Spinning up additional virtual machines is extremely low-cost, so it’s fairly simple to add a new server and migrate your applications over. But how much work this is depends on the types of servers and how many you need to move.
“Organizations operating lots of physical 2003 servers or bespoke applications that haven’t been upgraded yet will likely face the biggest challenge. To minimise the security impact, the government’s Cyber Essentials Scheme is a great way for smaller businesses to identify where the risks lie and find practical ways to improve.
“It is important that organizations have a clear view of all the options available to them prior to end of life next month. They need to be in a position now where they are able to make an informed decision for the sake of their business,” Arean concluded.